Monthly Archives: November 2012

Mad or bad?

A week ago I had a brief contretemps with a van driver, in which I found myself drawing attention to his reckless behaviour. He replied that he was not concerned about other people. I checked my rejoinder that he must … Continue reading

Posted in Bio-ethics, Catholic Herald columns, Moral judgment | 35 Comments

On the one hand…

A friend of mine asked me the other day why I had published two successive posts – one, apparently in favour of contraception and one apparently against contraception. The reason is bias blind spot, which I mentioned in my post … Continue reading

Posted in Moral judgment, Philosophy, Quentin queries | 44 Comments

You scratch my back…

Have you heard of the Machiavellian brain hypothesis? It was put forward to explain why our human brains are advanced over those of the brute beasts by a much larger margin than was required for survival. The suggestion was that … Continue reading

Posted in Catholic Herald columns, Moral judgment, Philosophy | Tagged | 17 Comments

It comes with the territory

Since my previous post has concerned the question of fertility, it is important to recall that an accompaniment of artificial contraception has been a huge increase in promiscuity. Separating the pregnancy threat has led to sexual expression becoming less significant … Continue reading

Posted in Bio-ethics, Moral judgment, Quentin queries | Tagged , , , , | 119 Comments

Fair means or foul

Houston, we have a problem. In my column of October 5, in the context of ethical problems for the future, I wrote: “Our long-established habit of deducing moral imperatives from structure will have to survive our acceptance that God created … Continue reading

Posted in Bio-ethics, Catholic Herald columns, Moral judgment, Quentin queries | Tagged , , , , | 87 Comments